Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

“Climate Science” Is a Contradiction in Terms

Scientists are starting to rebel against the perversion of science by the powerful multi-hundred billion dollar climate industrial complex.

Ulf Buntgen of Cambridge University in England has written in the latest journal Nature that there is now an “ongoing pseudo-scientific chase for record-breaking heatwaves and associated hydroclimatic extremes”. He warns there is a danger that “the complex field of global climate (could) become a dogmatic ersatz religion for the wider public.”

He cites many examples of how science has given way to politics.

Guardian journalist helped get a science paper retracted from a major journal because it cast observational doubt on claims of a climate emergency.

Google banned an ad showing accurate satellite temperature on the grounds of “unreliable and harmful claims” of global readings.

The number of climate dissidents keeps growing despite the attempts to mute them. Dr. Matthew Wielicki, a geoscientist at the University of Alabama, left his position last year because he said that American universities, “are no longer places that embrace the freedom of exchanging ideas” and that they now “punish” climate dissenters.

Patrick Brown, formerly of Johns Hopkins University, wrote a searing piece entitled “I Left Out the Full Truth to Get My Climate Change Paper Published.” The subtitle is: “I just got published in Nature because I stuck to a narrative I knew the editors would like. That’s not the way science should work.”

The climate change movement has become like the Flat Earth society of the Middle Ages that excoriated and banished anyone who dared tell the truth.

Unleash Prosperity Hotline


1155 15th St NW, Ste 525
Washington, DC 20005